Get Ready for the ISMPP Annual Meeting—and Make It Count

The 2026 Annual Meeting of ISMPP takes place on April 19-22 in Washington, D.C. See you there!

Amplifying Science: A Guide to Developing Impactful Podcasts

In the ever-evolving landscape of medical communications, podcasts have emerged as a useful tool for disseminating medical information. These on-demand audio programs offer a unique blend of accessibility and conversational engagement, making them a beneficial medium for reaching health care professionals, researchers, and patients. This article provides some insights and tips on how to create engaging audio experiences that enhance scientific discourse and extend the reach of publications.

Unlocking Evidence Impact: Aligning IEGPs and Strategic Publications for Smarter Communication

In today’s data-rich environment, the life sciences sector continues to struggle with a surprisingly persistent challenge: inconsistent communication of evidence across stakeholder audiences. A practical way forward is the alignment of Integrated Evidence Generation Plans (IEGPs) with strategic publication planning. This article explores how medical communications and publications professionals can help create stronger, more coordinated scientific communication by connecting the “what” (evidence generation) with the “when, where, and how” (dissemination).

Latest Articles

Trending

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

In Practice

Let’s Take It From the Top: A View into Video Abstracts 

Let’s Take It From the Top: A View into Video Abstracts 

Interest in video abstracts accompanying published manuscripts has been growing among authors and pharmaceutical company sponsors of clinical trials over the past few years. Video abstracts offer potential benefits by allowing the authors to introduce study information in a visual format, and possibly include additional study information in a video…

Plagiarism Takes Center Stage in Annals Letter

Plagiarism Takes Center Stage in Annals Letter

Plagiarism in scientific literature took center stage in a harrowing letter published in Annals of Internal Medicine on December 13, 2016. The letter, penned by researcher Michael Dansinger, MD, was directed to the individual who had admitted to unethically stealing and publishing Dansinger’s work as his own…

Scientific Platforms 101:  A Foundation for Consistent Medical Communications

Scientific Platforms 101: A Foundation for Consistent Medical Communications

“Our team is having trouble prioritizing our medical communication activities.” “Across our team, we cannot agree on core communication concepts.” “Our publication agency performed a lexicon analysis of our publications and found significant inconsistencies with how we described the mechanism of our product.” Have you heard someone say these things within your company?…

From ISMPP

Global Transparency Committee

Global Transparency Committee

With the evolving requirements and expectations for the pharmaceutical industry to increase its transparency related to clinical trial data, medical publication practices and financial disclosure, the need exists for ISMPP members to stay apprised of recent developments and current best practices for adoption by their companies. The ISMPP Global Transparency Committee…

ISMPP Shares Member Publications and Presentations

ISMPP Shares Member Publications and Presentations

ISMPP is pleased to share these recent publications and presentations by members of the Society. The publication and presentation of research and information that report on publishing practices is necessary to advance the medical publications profession, and improve standards and best practices…

What Would You Do?

POLL: Delayed Review Calls Authorship into Question

You are a company medical publication professional. The lead author of a manuscript in development was key in acquiring data for the study and actively engaged in the initial discussions that shaped the outline for the paper. However, he/she was slow to send feedback…

POLL RESULTS: Presenting Author Changes Slides Just Before Oral Presentation

You are a company publication professional and have been supporting authors to develop an oral presentation for a scientific congress. The content is agreed upon and approved by authors prior to the start of the congress. Both sponsor and medical writing agency colleagues are onsite to provide support, and it was agreed that the presenting author would upload the slides to the system…

In our role as medical publication professionals, we may occasionally encounter situations in which it is not obvious how to ensure good publication practice. Have you ever wished you could consult the ISMPP membership for guidance when these situations arise? Here’s your opportunity!

What Would You Do? is a section of ISMPP Insider that presents case scenarios as an educational tool for medical publication professionals. The section provides a case scenario to ponder, and readers are invited to participate in a poll by selecting one of the listed solutions. Readers can also submit their thoughts on the scenario anonymously. The poll results, plus educational insights, are posted in a later issue for readers to digest.

New! Content Lab

About Content Lab

Content Lab is ISMPP Insider’s dedicated space for timely, relevant, and practical insights in medical communications. Content Lab features concise articles designed to inform, inspire, and spark conversation among our members.​

Whether you’re looking for a quick tip or a deeper dive into the challenges and opportunities facing medical publication and communication professionals,Content Lab delivers informed perspectives, straight from ISMPP. Our goal: to beyour trusted voice for advancing best practices, integrity, and innovation inmedical communications.​

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

Knowledge Hub

Explore

ISMPP Insider’s Knowledge Hub represents a central space for exploring and discovering content, new and older. Content is organized across foundational and applied themes and topics. Explore curated collections or targeted searches to view recent and archival material.
Blue, Green, & White icon with scales of justice, integrity badge, and checkmark

Ethics, Integrity, & Transparency

Principles, values, and real-world considerations that guide ethical decision-making, transparency, and trust in medical publications and communications (the WHY)

Blue, Green, & White icon with scales of justice, integrity badge, and checkmark

Medical Writing & Communications

Practical perspectives on writing quality, collaboration, and the day-to-day practice and craft of medical communications

Blue, Green, & White icon with scales of justice, integrity badge, and checkmark

Standards, Guidelines, & Policies

Authoritative guidelines, policies, and evolving requirements that operationalize ethical and transparent practices and support consistent implementation  (the HOW)

Blue, Green, & White icon with scales of justice, integrity badge, and checkmark

Innovation & Technology

Informed perspectives on emerging tools, technologies, and evolving practices shaping the future of medical communications

Blue, Green, & White icon with scales of justice, integrity badge, and checkmark

Publication Strategy & Planning

Strategic approaches to planning, aligning, and delivering evidence and publications across the research lifecycle

Blue, Green, & White icon with scales of justice, integrity badge, and checkmark

Professional Development & Community

Insights and experiences that support career growth, skills development, and engagement across the medical communications community

Some sections of our new ISMPP Insider blog are still a work-in-progress. Thank you for your patience as we continue to optimize the site for our community.

Follow Us

Join Our Newsletter